Pancakemiel ,

this is a fine example to start with , about freedom of speech , it is an instant product of dried eggpowder , wheat , and flower , and the A-brand , holding it in a paperbag that is glued to the bottem of the cartonbox , the problem is not that big but it is to see I got storagetrouble sometime's more than moneytrouble , with that I bought the lower price one also , with the pleasant fact that paperbag is not glued to the bottem of the cartonbox , so you can take out and put 'clamm' on to shutt it like this more easy by pulling the paperbag out , leaving less air in the bag also , but the cartonbox with the brand it selve is off , with the advertisement also , not a big problem , you allready bought it , and get to think when the A-brand sells 'to' good they remove the paperbag from the lower price cartonbox , and you buy the quality of the lower price brand for a A-brand price , some dislike thans you think that and share that , also on the conservating part , and better or not part , I don't know if this A-brand does do that , but some politicians like to scare you with the thought you might dammage the economy and go you shouldt not say that , what is strange , "The people off ......." is not a problem , but diving into information on consumerproducts is by some a danger to the economy , while products survive only on this , in a way of commercial trade , and what politicians fear , keeps a ballanced price , when the lower price is sold more , the A-brand can do two things , well three , get cheaper them selve's , or go to superbquality or the worst get the cheap brand of the market , and politicians shouldt not do that , what protect us ? they shouldt not mind that you as a consumer think for your selve , and go on individual made choice's , like the unknown board does from a well known A-brand .